Xeon w9-3575X vs Microsoft SQ1

VS

Aggregate performance score

Microsoft SQ1
2019
8 cores / 8 threads
3.73
Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
52.02
+1295%

Xeon w9-3575X outperforms Microsoft SQ1 by a whopping 1295% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking148830
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.96
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragonno data
Power efficiencyno data14.47
Architecture codenameCortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date2 October 2019 (5 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)44
Threads888
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB97.5 MB
Chip lithography7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)no data340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardQualcomm Adreno 685N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Microsoft SQ1 3.73
Xeon w9-3575X 52.02
+1295%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Microsoft SQ1 5918
Xeon w9-3575X 82624
+1296%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.73 52.02
Recency 2 October 2019 24 August 2024
Physical cores 8 44
Threads 8 88

Xeon w9-3575X has a 1294.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 450% more physical cores and 1000% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Microsoft SQ1 in performance tests.

Be aware that Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Microsoft SQ1 and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Microsoft SQ1
SQ1
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 58 votes

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Microsoft SQ1 or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.