Processor 300 vs MediaTek Kompanio 520
Aggregate performance score
Processor 300 outperforms MediaTek Kompanio 520 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing MediaTek Kompanio 520 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1943 | 1319 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | MediaTek Kompanio 500 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.27 |
| Architecture codename | 2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55 | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| Release date | no data | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $82 |
Detailed specifications
MediaTek Kompanio 520 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 163 mm2 |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on MediaTek Kompanio 520 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by MediaTek Kompanio 520 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
MediaTek Kompanio 520 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by MediaTek Kompanio 520 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by MediaTek Kompanio 520 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by MediaTek Kompanio 520 and Processor 300.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.98 | 4.51 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
MediaTek Kompanio 520 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
Processor 300, on the other hand, has a 127.8% higher aggregate performance score.
The Processor 300 is our recommended choice as it beats the MediaTek Kompanio 520 in performance tests.
Be aware that MediaTek Kompanio 520 is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between MediaTek Kompanio 520 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
