Ultra 9 185H vs GX-210JA

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GX-210JA
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.15
Core Ultra 9 185H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 45 Watt
18.37
+12147%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms GX-210JA by a whopping 12147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing GX-210JA and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3341335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMDIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency2.3838.88
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$640

Detailed specifications

GX-210JA and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Low Power Efficient-coresno data2
Threads222
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 4 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on GX-210JA and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3 BGAFCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

GX-210JA and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by GX-210JA and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.35 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of GX-210JA and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by GX-210JA and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by GX-210JA and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by GX-210JA and Core Ultra 9 185H.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data8
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GX-210JA 0.15
Ultra 9 185H 18.37
+12147%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

GX-210JA 248
Ultra 9 185H 29424
+11765%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 18.37
Recency 23 May 2013 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 22
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 45 Watt

GX-210JA has 650% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 185H, on the other hand, has a 12146.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1000% more threads.

The Core Ultra 9 185H is our recommended choice as it beats the GX-210JA in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between GX-210JA and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 468 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about GX-210JA or Core Ultra 9 185H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.