A8-6410 vs FirePro A320

VS

Aggregate performance score

FirePro A320
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.36
+21.4%
A8-6410
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.12

A320 outperforms A8-6410 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FirePro A320 and A8-6410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22382394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.297.07
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Beema (2014)
Release date7 August 2012 (12 years ago)1 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FirePro A320 and A8-6410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache192Kno data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)2048 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on FirePro A320 and A8-6410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FirePro A320 and A8-6410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FirePro A320 and A8-6410 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FirePro A320 and A8-6410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3L-1866
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardFireProAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FirePro A320 and A8-6410 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FirePro A320 and A8-6410 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FirePro A320 and A8-6410.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro A320 1.36
+21.4%
A8-6410 1.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FirePro A320 2153
+21.5%
A8-6410 1772

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 1.12
Recency 7 August 2012 1 June 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

FirePro A320 has a 21.4% higher aggregate performance score.

A8-6410, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The FirePro A320 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-6410 in performance tests.

Note that FirePro A320 is a desktop processor while A8-6410 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FirePro A320 and A8-6410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FirePro A320
FirePro A320
AMD A8-6410
A8-6410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate FirePro A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 323 votes

Rate A8-6410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FirePro A320 or A8-6410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.