Atom E3826 vs FX-9800P
Primary details
Comparing FX-9800P and Atom E3826 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2086 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | Atom |
| Power efficiency | 10.09 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Bay Trail-I (2013) |
| Release date | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) | 8 October 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-9800P and Atom E3826 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.47 GHz |
| L1 cache | 320 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per module) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on FX-9800P and Atom E3826 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP4 | Intel BGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and Atom E3826. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9800P and Atom E3826 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and Atom E3826. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) | Intel HD Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9800P and Atom E3826.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.95 | 0.77 |
| Recency | 31 May 2016 | 8 October 2013 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 7 Watt |
FX-9800P has 153.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Atom E3826, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-9800P and Atom E3826. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and Atom E3826, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
