Athlon 650 vs FX-9800P

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-9800P and Athlon 650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2147not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency10.10no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Thunderbird (1999−2000)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)9 August 1999 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$849

Detailed specifications

FX-9800P and Athlon 650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz0.65 GHz
L1 cache320 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per module)512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm180 nm
Die size250 mm2184 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million22 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-9800P and Athlon 650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4A
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt48 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and Athlon 650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9800P and Athlon 650 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and Athlon 650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9800P and Athlon 650.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2016 9 August 1999
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 48 Watt

FX-9800P has an age advantage of 16 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-9800P and Athlon 650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FX-9800P is a notebook processor while Athlon 650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and Athlon 650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P
AMD Athlon 650
Athlon 650

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 44 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Athlon 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9800P or Athlon 650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.