PRO A8-9600 vs FX-9590

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9590
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
6.42
+207%
PRO A8-9600
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.09

FX-9590 outperforms PRO A8-9600 by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9590 and PRO A8-9600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10521876
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.763.04
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)3 October 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9590 and PRO A8-9600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed4.7 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.4 GHz
L2 cache8192 KB2048 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9590 and PRO A8-9600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and PRO A8-9600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and PRO A8-9600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and PRO A8-9600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-9590 and PRO A8-9600 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-9590 and PRO A8-9600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and PRO A8-9600.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9590 6.42
+207%
PRO A8-9600 2.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9590 10194
+207%
PRO A8-9600 3322

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.42 2.09
Recency 6 July 2013 3 October 2016
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 65 Watt

FX-9590 has a 207.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

PRO A8-9600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 238.5% lower power consumption.

The FX-9590 is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A8-9600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9590 and PRO A8-9600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9590
FX-9590
AMD PRO A8-9600
PRO A8-9600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 939 votes

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 34 votes

Rate PRO A8-9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9590 or PRO A8-9600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.