Ryzen 3 1300X vs FX-9370

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9370
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
3.95
Ryzen 3 1300X
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.38
+10.9%

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms FX-9370 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9370 and Ryzen 3 1300X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14401352
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.95
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency1.706.37
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9370 and Ryzen 3 1300X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed4.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data34
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9370 and Ryzen 3 1300X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and Ryzen 3 1300X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and Ryzen 3 1300X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and Ryzen 3 1300X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and Ryzen 3 1300X.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9370 3.95
Ryzen 3 1300X 4.38
+10.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9370 6273
Ryzen 3 1300X 6964
+11%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-9370 512
Ryzen 3 1300X 1101
+115%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-9370 2029
Ryzen 3 1300X 3125
+54%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.95 4.38
Recency 6 July 2013 27 July 2017
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 65 Watt

FX-9370 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 3 1300X, on the other hand, has a 10.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 238.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 1300X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9370 and Ryzen 3 1300X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9370
FX-9370
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
Ryzen 3 1300X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 162 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 278 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 1300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9370 or Ryzen 3 1300X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.