Sempron X2 240 vs FX-8370E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370E and Sempron X2 240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1571not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.67no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.33no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8370E and Sempron X2 240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370E and Sempron X2 240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FM2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370E and Sempron X2 240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370E and Sempron X2 240 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370E and Sempron X2 240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1600

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370E and Sempron X2 240.

PCIe versionn/a2.0

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

FX-8370E has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Sempron X2 240, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-8370E and Sempron X2 240. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370E and Sempron X2 240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370E
FX-8370E
AMD Sempron X2 240
Sempron X2 240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 87 votes

Rate FX-8370E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 13 votes

Rate Sempron X2 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370E or Sempron X2 240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.