FX-8370E vs FX-8350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8350
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.74
+12%
FX-8370E
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.34

FX-8350 outperforms FX-8370E by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8350 and FX-8370E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14771571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.760.59
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency2.833.33
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)2 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-8350 has 29% better value for money than FX-8370E.

Detailed specifications

FX-8350 and FX-8370E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.3 GHz
L2 cache8192 KB8192 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 VMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and FX-8370E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and FX-8370E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1no data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and FX-8370E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and FX-8370E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and FX-8370E.

PCIe versionn/an/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8350 3.74
+12%
FX-8370E 3.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8350 5936
+11.9%
FX-8370E 5306

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

FX-8350 7380
FX-8370E 7570
+2.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.74 3.34
Recency 23 October 2012 2 September 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt

FX-8350 has a 12% higher aggregate performance score.

FX-8370E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

The FX-8350 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8370E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and FX-8370E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
AMD FX-8370E
FX-8370E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3694 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 87 votes

Rate FX-8370E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8350 or FX-8370E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.