Xeon 6952P vs FX-8320E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320E and Xeon 6952P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1623not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.83no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.09no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Granite Rapids (2024)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$147no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8320E and Xeon 6952P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)96
Threads8192
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data480 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and Xeon 6952P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+7529
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and Xeon 6952P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

FX-8320E and Xeon 6952P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and Xeon 6952P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and Xeon 6952P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and Xeon 6952P.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2014 24 September 2024
Physical cores 8 96
Threads 8 192
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 400 Watt

FX-8320E has 321.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6952P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-8320E and Xeon 6952P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8320E is a desktop processor while Xeon 6952P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and Xeon 6952P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E
Intel Xeon 6952P
Xeon 6952P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1115 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 24 votes

Rate Xeon 6952P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320E or Xeon 6952P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.