Ryzen 7 3800X vs FX-8320E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8320E
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.24
Ryzen 7 3800X
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
15.12
+367%

Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms FX-8320E by a whopping 367% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320E and Ryzen 7 3800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1607483
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.7516.42
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency3.1113.13
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$147$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 3800X has 2089% better value for money than FX-8320E.

Detailed specifications

FX-8320E and Ryzen 7 3800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache8192 KB4 MB
L3 cacheno data32 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and Ryzen 7 3800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen 7 3800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen 7 3800X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen 7 3800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen 7 3800X.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320E 3.24
Ryzen 7 3800X 15.12
+367%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8320E 4960
Ryzen 7 3800X 23141
+367%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8320E 439
Ryzen 7 3800X 1700
+287%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8320E 1689
Ryzen 7 3800X 8204
+386%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.24 15.12
Recency 2 September 2014 27 May 2019
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 105 Watt

FX-8320E has 10.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 3800X, on the other hand, has a 366.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 3800X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and Ryzen 7 3800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Ryzen 7 3800X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1101 vote

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1734 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320E or Ryzen 7 3800X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.