i9-12900HK vs FX-8320E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8320E
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.13
Core i9-12900HK
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 45 Watt
17.29
+452%

Core i9-12900HK outperforms FX-8320E by a whopping 452% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320E and Core i9-12900HK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1613366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.69no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-P
Power efficiency3.1036.21
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Alder Lake-H (2022)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$147no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8320E and Core i9-12900HK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size315 mm2217 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and Core i9-12900HK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and Core i9-12900HK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-8320E and Core i9-12900HK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and Core i9-12900HK are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and Core i9-12900HK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data96

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8320E and Core i9-12900HK integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-8320E and Core i9-12900HK integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8320E and Core i9-12900HK integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and Core i9-12900HK.

PCIe versionn/a4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320E 3.13
i9-12900HK 17.29
+452%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8320E 4960
i9-12900HK 27369
+452%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.13 17.29
Recency 2 September 2014 4 January 2022
Physical cores 8 14
Threads 8 20
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 45 Watt

i9-12900HK has a 452.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 75% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and 111.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-12900HK is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320E in performance tests.

Note that FX-8320E is a desktop processor while Core i9-12900HK is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and Core i9-12900HK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
Core i9-12900HK

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1108 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 66 votes

Rate Core i9-12900HK on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320E or Core i9-12900HK, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.