Opteron 6366 HE vs FX-8300

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8300
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.36
Opteron 6366 HE
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
3.53
+5.1%

Opteron 6366 HE outperforms FX-8300 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8300 and Opteron 6366 HE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15771533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.353.93
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Abu Dhabi (2012)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)5 November 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8300 and Opteron 6366 HE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.3 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data768 KB
L2 cache8192 KB16 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8300 and Opteron 6366 HE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketAM3+G34
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8300 and Opteron 6366 HE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8300 and Opteron 6366 HE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8300 and Opteron 6366 HE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8300 and Opteron 6366 HE.

PCIe versionn/a2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8300 3.36
Opteron 6366 HE 3.53
+5.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8300 5339
Opteron 6366 HE 5613
+5.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.36 3.53
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 85 Watt

Opteron 6366 HE has a 5.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 11.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FX-8300 and Opteron 6366 HE.

Note that FX-8300 is a desktop processor while Opteron 6366 HE is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8300 and Opteron 6366 HE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8300
FX-8300
AMD Opteron 6366 HE
Opteron 6366 HE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2391 vote

Rate FX-8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Opteron 6366 HE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8300 or Opteron 6366 HE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.