Athlon X4 860K vs FX-8300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8300
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.36
+55.6%
Athlon X4 860K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.16

FX-8300 outperforms Athlon X4 860K by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8300 and Athlon X4 860K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15641847
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.352.15
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)12 August 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8300 and Athlon X4 860K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data256K
L2 cache8192 KB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8300 and Athlon X4 860K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8300 and Athlon X4 860K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8300 and Athlon X4 860K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8300 and Athlon X4 860K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8300 and Athlon X4 860K.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8300 3.36
+55.6%
Athlon X4 860K 2.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8300 5337
+55.4%
Athlon X4 860K 3434

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8300 457
Athlon X4 860K 460
+0.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8300 1720
+52.2%
Athlon X4 860K 1130

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

FX-8300 6090
+55.8%
Athlon X4 860K 3910

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.36 2.16
Recency 23 October 2012 12 August 2014
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

FX-8300 has a 55.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon X4 860K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-8300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 860K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8300 and Athlon X4 860K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8300
FX-8300
AMD Athlon X4 860K
Athlon X4 860K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2360 votes

Rate FX-8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 253 votes

Rate Athlon X4 860K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8300 or Athlon X4 860K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.