Core i7-990X Extreme Edition vs FX-8170

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8170 and Core i7-990X Extreme Edition processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7EE
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)13 February 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8170 and Core i7-990X Extreme Edition basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.46 GHz
Bus supportno data6.4 GT/s
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache8 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2239 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-8170 and Core i7-990X Extreme Edition compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8170 and Core i7-990X Extreme Edition. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8170 and Core i7-990X Extreme Edition are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8170 and Core i7-990X Extreme Edition. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data24 GB

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8170 and Core i7-990X Extreme Edition.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 13 February 2011
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 8 12
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 130 Watt

FX-8170 has an age advantage of 1 year, 33.3% more physical cores, and 4% lower power consumption.

i7-990X Extreme Edition, on the other hand, has 50% more threads.

We couldn't decide between FX-8170 and Core i7-990X Extreme Edition. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8170 and Core i7-990X Extreme Edition, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8170
FX-8170
Intel Core i7-990X Extreme Edition
Core i7-990X Extreme Edition

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate FX-8170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 46 votes

Rate Core i7-990X Extreme Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8170 or Core i7-990X Extreme Edition, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.