N100 vs FX-8150

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8150
2011
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.31
N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
3.45
+4.2%

N100 outperforms FX-8150 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8150 and N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15881556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency2.5054.38
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)no data
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8150 and N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache8192 KBno data
L3 cache8192 KB6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.0125 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8150 and N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8150 and N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+

Security technologies

FX-8150 and N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8150 and N100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8150 and N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8150 and N100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-8150 and N100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8150 and N100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8150 and N100.

PCIe versionn/ano data
PCI Express lanesno data9
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8150 3.31
N100 3.45
+4.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8150 5263
N100 5478
+4.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.31 3.45
Recency 12 October 2011 1 January 2023
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 6 Watt

FX-8150 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

N100, on the other hand, has a 4.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and 1983.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FX-8150 and N100.

Note that FX-8150 is a desktop processor while N100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8150 and N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8150
FX-8150
Intel N100
N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 444 votes

Rate FX-8150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 187 votes

Rate N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8150 or N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.