EPYC 9375F vs FX-7600P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9375F outperforms FX-7600P by a whopping 3475% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing FX-7600P and EPYC 9375F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2121 | 22 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 7.49 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Kaveri | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.38 | 17.14 |
| Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 4 June 2014 (10 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $5,306 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
FX-7600P and EPYC 9375F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.85 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | BGA (FP3) | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 245 mm2 | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,410 million | 66,520 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-7600P and EPYC 9375F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FP3 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 320 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7600P and EPYC 9375F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| Out-of-band client management | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| HSA | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7600P and EPYC 9375F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7600P and EPYC 9375F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR5 |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | N/A |
| iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of FX-7600P and EPYC 9375F integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by FX-7600P and EPYC 9375F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7600P and EPYC 9375F.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.61 | 57.56 |
| Recency | 4 June 2014 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 32 |
| Threads | 4 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 320 Watt |
FX-7600P has 814.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9375F, on the other hand, has a 3475.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
The EPYC 9375F is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-7600P in performance tests.
Be aware that FX-7600P is a notebook processor while EPYC 9375F is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7600P and EPYC 9375F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
