Celeron G1840 vs FX-6350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6350
2013
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.97
+156%

FX-6350 outperforms Celeron G1840 by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6350 and Celeron G1840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16542385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.35
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.171.96
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)1 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$53

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6350 and Celeron G1840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size315 mm2177 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6350 and Celeron G1840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt53 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and Celeron G1840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

FX-6350 and Celeron G1840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and Celeron G1840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and Celeron G1840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memoryno data1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-6350 and Celeron G1840 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+
VGAno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-6350 and Celeron G1840 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno data1920x1200@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-6350 and Celeron G1840 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.1/12
OpenGLno data4.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and Celeron G1840.

PCIe versionn/aUp to 3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6350 2.97
+156%
Celeron G1840 1.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6350 4551
+156%
Celeron G1840 1777

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-6350 485
+0.6%
Celeron G1840 482

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-6350 1535
+87.9%
Celeron G1840 817

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

FX-6350 5630
+103%
Celeron G1840 2780

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.97 1.16
Recency 29 April 2013 1 May 2014
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 53 Watt

FX-6350 has a 156% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Celeron G1840, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 135.8% lower power consumption.

The FX-6350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1840 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6350 and Celeron G1840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6350
FX-6350
Intel Celeron G1840
Celeron G1840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 365 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 234 votes

Rate Celeron G1840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6350 or Celeron G1840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.