Xeon Platinum 8376H vs FX-6300

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Xeon Platinum 8376H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1714not rated
Place by popularity66not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.52no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.59no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Xeon Platinum 8376H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads656
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache288 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Xeon Platinum 8376H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18
SocketAM3+FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Xeon Platinum 8376H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-6300 and Xeon Platinum 8376H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Xeon Platinum 8376H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Xeon Platinum 8376H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4 RDIMM
Maximum memory sizeno data1.12 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Xeon Platinum 8376H.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 6 April 2021
Physical cores 6 28
Threads 6 56
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 205 Watt

FX-6300 has 115.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8376H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 366.7% more physical cores and 833.3% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-6300 and Xeon Platinum 8376H. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-6300 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8376H is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Xeon Platinum 8376H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
Intel Xeon Platinum 8376H
Xeon Platinum 8376H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4087 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8376H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Xeon Platinum 8376H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.