Pentium 4 HT 550 vs FX-6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Pentium 4 HT 550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1716not rated
Place by popularity66not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.60no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.59no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)June 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Pentium 4 HT 550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache288 KB16 KB
L2 cache6144 KB1 MB
L3 cache8192 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size315 mm2109 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million125 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Pentium 4 HT 550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Pentium 4 HT 550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Pentium 4 HT 550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Pentium 4 HT 550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Pentium 4 HT 550.

PCIe version3.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 115 Watt

FX-6300 has 500% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 21.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-6300 and Pentium 4 HT 550. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Pentium 4 HT 550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
Intel Pentium 4 HT 550
Pentium 4 HT 550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4102 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Pentium 4 HT 550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.