Pentium 3558U vs FX-6300

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.60
+300%
Pentium 3558U
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.65

FX-6300 outperforms Pentium 3558U by a whopping 300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Pentium 3558U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17322762
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.64no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Power efficiency2.594.10
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132$161

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Pentium 3558U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache288 KB128 KB
L2 cache6144 KB512 KB
L3 cache8192 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Pentium 3558U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Pentium 3558U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Pentium 3558U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Pentium 3558U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Pentium 3558U.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 2.60
+300%
Pentium 3558U 0.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6300 4137
+298%
Pentium 3558U 1040

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 0.65
Recency 23 October 2012 1 January 2014
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

FX-6300 has a 300% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Pentium 3558U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The FX-6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3558U in performance tests.

Note that FX-6300 is a desktop processor while Pentium 3558U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Pentium 3558U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
Intel Pentium 3558U
Pentium 3558U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4204 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 107 votes

Rate Pentium 3558U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Pentium 3558U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.