Celeron 1019Y vs FX-6300
Primary details
Comparing FX-6300 and Celeron 1019Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1714 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 66 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.52 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 2.59 | no data |
Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 April 2013 (11 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $132 | $153 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
FX-6300 and Celeron 1019Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 6 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
L1 cache | 288 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 6144 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 8192 KB | 2 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-6300 and Celeron 1019Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM3+ | FCBGA1023 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Celeron 1019Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
My WiFi | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FDI | no data | + |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
FX-6300 and Celeron 1019Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Celeron 1019Y are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Celeron 1019Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 800 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of FX-6300 and Celeron 1019Y integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
SDVO | no data | + |
CRT | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Celeron 1019Y.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 23 October 2012 | 1 April 2013 |
Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
Threads | 6 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
FX-6300 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Celeron 1019Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-6300 and Celeron 1019Y. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-6300 is a desktop processor while Celeron 1019Y is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Celeron 1019Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.