Athlon 240GE vs FX-6300

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.60
Athlon 240GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.85
+9.6%

Athlon 240GE outperforms FX-6300 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Athlon 240GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17311676
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.643.42
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Power efficiency2.597.71
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)6 September 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 240GE has 434% better value for money than FX-6300.

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Athlon 240GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache288 KB192 KB
L2 cache6144 KB1 MB
L3 cache8192 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Athlon 240GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Athlon 240GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Athlon 240GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Athlon 240GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Athlon 240GE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 2.60
Athlon 240GE 2.85
+9.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6300 4137
Athlon 240GE 4527
+9.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 2.85
Recency 23 October 2012 6 September 2018
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

FX-6300 has 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Athlon 240GE, on the other hand, has a 9.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FX-6300 and Athlon 240GE.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Athlon 240GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
AMD Athlon 240GE
Athlon 240GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4188 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 60 votes

Rate Athlon 240GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Athlon 240GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.