Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs FX-6200

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6200
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.57
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.72
+44.7%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U outperforms FX-6200 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17451489
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency1.9423.46
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)8 April 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache288 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size315 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+FP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6200 2.57
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 3.72
+44.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6200 4075
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 5916
+45.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 3.72
Recency 27 February 2012 8 April 2019
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

FX-6200 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, on the other hand, has a 44.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6200 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6200 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6200
FX-6200
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 135 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 30 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6200 or Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.