Atom S1220 vs FX-6130
Primary details
Comparing FX-6130 and Atom S1220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1692 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 2.73 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Centerton (2012) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 11 December 2012 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-6130 and Atom S1220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 288 KB | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on FX-6130 and Atom S1220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | FCBGA1283 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 8.1 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6130 and Atom S1220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6130 and Atom S1220 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6130 and Atom S1220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 10.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6130 and Atom S1220.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
| PCI support | no data | PCI Support |
| UART | no data | UART |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 11 December 2012 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 8 Watt |
FX-6130 has 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Atom S1220, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 1087.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-6130 and Atom S1220. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-6130 is a desktop processor while Atom S1220 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6130 and Atom S1220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
