Turion II Neo K685 vs FX-6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6100
2011
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.32
+440%
Turion II Neo K685
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.43

FX-6100 outperforms Turion II Neo K685 by a whopping 440% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and Turion II Neo K685 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18092968
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Turion II Neo
Power efficiency2.312.71
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Geneva (2010)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)15 December 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and Turion II Neo K685 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data3200 MHz
L1 cache288 KB256 KB
L2 cache6 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and Turion II Neo K685 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+S1g4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and Turion II Neo K685. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and Turion II Neo K685 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and Turion II Neo K685. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and Turion II Neo K685.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6100 2.32
+440%
Turion II Neo K685 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6100 3691
+440%
Turion II Neo K685 684

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.32 0.43
Recency 12 October 2011 15 December 2010
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

FX-6100 has a 439.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Turion II Neo K685, on the other hand, has 533.3% lower power consumption.

The FX-6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Neo K685 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6100 is a desktop processor while Turion II Neo K685 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and Turion II Neo K685, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6100
FX-6100
AMD Turion II Neo K685
Turion II Neo K685

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1112 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Turion II Neo K685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6100 or Turion II Neo K685, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.