Celeron 7300 vs FX-6100

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and Celeron 7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1794not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency2.32no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Alder Lake-U (2022)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)23 February 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and Celeron 7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads65
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache288 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and Celeron 7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCBGA1781
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and Celeron 7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-6100 and Celeron 7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and Celeron 7300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and Celeron 7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-6100 and Celeron 7300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-6100 and Celeron 7300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-6100 and Celeron 7300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and Celeron 7300.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2011 23 February 2022
Physical cores 6 5
Threads 6 5
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 9 Watt

FX-6100 has 20% more physical cores and 20% more threads.

Celeron 7300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and 955.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-6100 and Celeron 7300. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-6100 is a desktop processor while Celeron 7300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and Celeron 7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6100
FX-6100
Intel Celeron 7300
Celeron 7300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1093 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 242 votes

Rate Celeron 7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6100 or Celeron 7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.