A4-9120C vs FX-6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6100
2011
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.31
+328%
A4-9120C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.54

FX-6100 outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18522897
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency2.328.57
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)6 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache288 KB160 KB
L2 cache6 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2124.5 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+BGA
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and A4-9120C.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-6100 2.31
+328%
A4-9120C 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6100 3699
+328%
A4-9120C 864

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.31 0.54
Recency 12 October 2011 6 January 2019
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 6 Watt

FX-6100 has a 327.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

A4-9120C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1483.3% lower power consumption.

The FX-6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120C in performance tests.

Note that FX-6100 is a desktop processor while A4-9120C is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6100
FX-6100
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1134 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 87 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-6100 and A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.