Phenom II X4 N950 vs FX-4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4300
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.88
+20.5%
Phenom II X4 N950
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.56

FX-4300 outperforms Phenom II X4 N950 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4300 and Phenom II X4 N950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19892120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.35no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data4x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency1.874.22
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)4 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4300 and Phenom II X4 N950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4300 and Phenom II X4 N950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+S1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4300 and Phenom II X4 N950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4300 and Phenom II X4 N950 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4300 and Phenom II X4 N950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4300 and Phenom II X4 N950.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4300 1.88
+20.5%
Phenom II X4 N950 1.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4300 2982
+20%
Phenom II X4 N950 2485

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-4300 454
+65.1%
Phenom II X4 N950 275

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-4300 1104
+12%
Phenom II X4 N950 986

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.88 1.56
Recency 23 October 2012 4 October 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

FX-4300 has a 20.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Phenom II X4 N950, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.

The FX-4300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 N950 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4300 is a desktop processor while Phenom II X4 N950 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4300 and Phenom II X4 N950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4300
FX-4300
AMD Phenom II X4 N950
Phenom II X4 N950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1744 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 28 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 N950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4300 or Phenom II X4 N950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.