i9-13900KF vs FX-4300

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4300
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.95
Core i9-13900KF
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
38.14
+1856%

Core i9-13900KF outperforms FX-4300 by a whopping 1856% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4300 and Core i9-13900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking196491
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2864.80
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i9
Power efficiency1.8713.75
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900KF has 23043% better value for money than FX-4300.

Detailed specifications

FX-4300 and Core i9-13900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 cache4096 KB16 MB
L3 cacheno data12 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size315 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4300 and Core i9-13900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4300 and Core i9-13900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-4300 and Core i9-13900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4300 and Core i9-13900KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4300 and Core i9-13900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.604 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4300 and Core i9-13900KF.

PCIe versionn/a5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4300 1.95
i9-13900KF 38.14
+1856%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4300 2985
i9-13900KF 58376
+1856%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-4300 453
i9-13900KF 2918
+544%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-4300 1103
i9-13900KF 19657
+1682%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.95 38.14
Recency 23 October 2012 27 September 2022
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

FX-4300 has 31.6% lower power consumption.

i9-13900KF, on the other hand, has a 1855.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 500% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Core i9-13900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4300 and Core i9-13900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4300
FX-4300
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1711 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 625 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4300 or Core i9-13900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.