i3-2332M vs FX-4300

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4300
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.91
+120%
Core i3-2332M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.87

FX-4300 outperforms Core i3-2332M by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4300 and Core i3-2332M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19712559
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency1.872.31
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4300 and Core i3-2332M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data22
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million624 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4300 and Core i3-2332M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+G2 (988B)
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4300 and Core i3-2332M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4300 and Core i3-2332M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4300 and Core i3-2332M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD Graphics 3000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4300 and Core i3-2332M.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4300 1.91
+120%
i3-2332M 0.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4300 2985
+121%
i3-2332M 1353

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 0.87
Recency 23 October 2012 1 September 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

FX-4300 has a 119.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores.

i3-2332M, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.

The FX-4300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2332M in performance tests.

Note that FX-4300 is a desktop processor while Core i3-2332M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4300 and Core i3-2332M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4300
FX-4300
Intel Core i3-2332M
Core i3-2332M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1723 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Core i3-2332M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4300 or Core i3-2332M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.