Opteron X2 875 HE vs FX-4170
Primary details
Comparing FX-4170 and Opteron X2 875 HE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1969 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Power efficiency | 1.45 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Egypt (2005−2006) |
Release date | 27 February 2012 (12 years ago) | February 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-4170 and Opteron X2 875 HE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 4.2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
L1 cache | 192 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 8192 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 233 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4170 and Opteron X2 875 HE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 |
Socket | AM3+ | 940 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4170 and Opteron X2 875 HE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4170 and Opteron X2 875 HE are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4170 and Opteron X2 875 HE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4170 and Opteron X2 875 HE.
PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 55 Watt |
FX-4170 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron X2 875 HE, on the other hand, has 127.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-4170 and Opteron X2 875 HE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-4170 is a desktop processor while Opteron X2 875 HE is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4170 and Opteron X2 875 HE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.