Celeron M 350 vs FX-4170

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-4170 and Celeron M 350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1960not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency1.45no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4170 and Celeron M 350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed4.2 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cache8192 KB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V

Compatibility

Information on FX-4170 and Celeron M 350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+PPGA478, H-PBGA479, H-PBGA478, PPGA479
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4170 and Celeron M 350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-4170 and Celeron M 350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4170 and Celeron M 350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4170 and Celeron M 350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4170 and Celeron M 350.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 21 Watt

FX-4170 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 350, on the other hand, has 495.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-4170 and Celeron M 350. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-4170 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4170 and Celeron M 350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4170
FX-4170
Intel Celeron M 350
Celeron M 350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 80 votes

Rate FX-4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Celeron M 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4170 or Celeron M 350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.