A8 PRO-7600B vs FX-4170

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4170
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.91
+2.7%
A8 PRO-7600B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.86

FX-4170 outperforms A8 PRO-7600B by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4170 and A8 PRO-7600B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19601983
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.452.71
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)31 July 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4170 and A8 PRO-7600B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.2 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KB4096 KB
L3 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4170 and A8 PRO-7600B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4170 and A8 PRO-7600B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4170 and A8 PRO-7600B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4170 and A8 PRO-7600B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Number of pipelinesno data384
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-4170 and A8 PRO-7600B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-4170 and A8 PRO-7600B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4170 and A8 PRO-7600B.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4170 1.91
+2.7%
A8 PRO-7600B 1.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4170 3034
+2.5%
A8 PRO-7600B 2960

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-4170 464
+11%
A8 PRO-7600B 418

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-4170 1201
+17.3%
A8 PRO-7600B 1024

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 1.86
Recency 27 February 2012 31 July 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

FX-4170 has a 2.7% higher aggregate performance score.

A8 PRO-7600B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FX-4170 and A8 PRO-7600B.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4170 and A8 PRO-7600B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4170
FX-4170
AMD A8 PRO-7600B
A8 PRO-7600B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 80 votes

Rate FX-4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 150 votes

Rate A8 PRO-7600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4170 or A8 PRO-7600B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.