Athlon MP 2400+ vs FX-4130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4130
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.70
+530%
Athlon MP 2400+
2002
1 core / 1 thread, 60 Watt
0.27

FX-4130 outperforms Athlon MP 2400+ by a whopping 530% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4130 and Athlon MP 2400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20583136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.31no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon MP
Power efficiency1.290.43
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)K7 (2000−2004)
Release date27 August 2012 (12 years ago)10 December 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$112$228

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-4130 and Athlon MP 2400+ have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

FX-4130 and Athlon MP 2400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data266 MT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB256 KB
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size315 mm285 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million37 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4130 and Athlon MP 2400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4130 and Athlon MP 2400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4130 and Athlon MP 2400+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4130 and Athlon MP 2400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4130 and Athlon MP 2400+.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4130 1.70
+530%
Athlon MP 2400+ 0.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4130 2696
+518%
Athlon MP 2400+ 436

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.70 0.27
Recency 27 August 2012 10 December 2002
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 60 Watt

FX-4130 has a 529.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon MP 2400+, on the other hand, has 108.3% lower power consumption.

The FX-4130 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon MP 2400+ in performance tests.

Note that FX-4130 is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 2400+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4130 and Athlon MP 2400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4130
FX-4130
AMD Athlon MP 2400+
Athlon MP 2400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 174 votes

Rate FX-4130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4130 or Athlon MP 2400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.