Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs EPYC Embedded 3301

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYC EmbeddedAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)4 June 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1224
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache1152 KBno data
L2 cache6 MBno data
L3 cache32 MB36 MB
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors9600 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXDNA 2 NPU
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size1 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 4 June 2024
Threads 12 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC Embedded 3301 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC Embedded 3301
EPYC Embedded 3301
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 170
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 7 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC Embedded 3301 or Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.