Xeon Platinum 8571N vs EPYC Embedded 3255

Primary details

Comparing EPYC Embedded 3255 and Xeon Platinum 8571N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated53
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.44
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYC Embeddedno data
Power efficiencyno data13.58
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,839

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC Embedded 3255 and Xeon Platinum 8571N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)52
Threads16104
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)300 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size213 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC Embedded 3255 and Xeon Platinum 8571N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAMD BGA SP4r2FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3255 and Xeon Platinum 8571N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC Embedded 3255 and Xeon Platinum 8571N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3255 and Xeon Platinum 8571N are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3255 and Xeon Platinum 8571N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory size512 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3255 and Xeon Platinum 8571N.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes3280

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 52
Threads 16 104
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 300 Watt

EPYC Embedded 3255 has 445.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8571N, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and 550% more physical cores and 550% more threads.

We couldn't decide between EPYC Embedded 3255 and Xeon Platinum 8571N. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC Embedded 3255 and Xeon Platinum 8571N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
EPYC Embedded 3255
Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC Embedded 3255 or Xeon Platinum 8571N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.