Xeon W-10885M vs EPYC 9754

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+538%
Xeon W-10885M
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.91

EPYC 9754 outperforms Xeon W-10885M by a whopping 538% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-10885M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12776
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.03no data
Market segmentServerMobile workstation
Seriesno dataComet Lake
Power efficiency16.6220.84
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)13 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-10885M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1288 (Octa-Core)
Threads25616
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-10885M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-10885M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-10885M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-10885M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-10885M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data45.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-10885M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-10885M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-10885M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-10885M.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
+538%
Xeon W-10885M 9.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+538%
Xeon W-10885M 15746

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 9.91
Recency 13 June 2023 13 May 2020
Physical cores 128 8
Threads 256 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 45 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 538.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon W-10885M, on the other hand, has 700% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-10885M in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Xeon W-10885M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Xeon W-10885M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
Intel Xeon W-10885M
Xeon W-10885M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 44 votes

Rate Xeon W-10885M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Xeon W-10885M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.