Xeon Phi 7230 vs EPYC 9754
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7230 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 12 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.03 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 16.62 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bergamo (2023) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (1 year ago) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $11,900 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 128 | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 256 | 256 |
| Base clock speed | 2.25 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 8x 73 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 71,000 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | 3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 360 Watt | 215 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7230 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7230.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 June 2023 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 128 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 360 Watt | 215 Watt |
EPYC 9754 has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon Phi 7230, on the other hand, has 67.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7230. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
