Xeon 6980P vs EPYC 9734

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9734 and Xeon 6980P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Granite Rapids (2024)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,600no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9734 and Xeon 6980P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores112128
Threads224256
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)504 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9734 and Xeon 6980P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP57529
Power consumption (TDP)340 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9734 and Xeon 6980P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9734 and Xeon 6980P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9734 and Xeon 6980P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9734 and Xeon 6980P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9734 and Xeon 6980P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12896

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2023 24 September 2024
Physical cores 112 128
Threads 224 256
Power consumption (TDP) 340 Watt 500 Watt

EPYC 9734 has 47.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6980P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 14.3% more physical cores and 14.3% more threads.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 9734 and Xeon 6980P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9734 and Xeon 6980P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9734
EPYC 9734
Intel Xeon 6980P
Xeon 6980P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9734 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate Xeon 6980P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9734 or Xeon 6980P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.