Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs EPYC 9684X

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9684X
2023
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
76.02
+498%
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
12.72

EPYC 9684X outperforms Ryzen Embedded V3C48 by a whopping 498% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9684X and Ryzen Embedded V3C48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5608
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency17.9926.75
Architecture codenameGenoa-X (2023)Rembrandt (2022)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,756no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9684X and Ryzen Embedded V3C48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores968 (Octa-Core)
Threads19216
Base clock speed2.55 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1152 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm6 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2no data
Number of transistors135,240 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9684X and Ryzen Embedded V3C48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FP7
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9684X and Ryzen Embedded V3C48. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9684X and Ryzen Embedded V3C48 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9684X and Ryzen Embedded V3C48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9684X and Ryzen Embedded V3C48.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9684X 76.02
+498%
Ryzen Embedded V3C48 12.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9684X 120760
+498%
Ryzen Embedded V3C48 20203

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 76.02 12.72
Recency 13 June 2023 27 September 2022
Physical cores 96 8
Threads 192 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 45 Watt

EPYC 9684X has a 497.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48, on the other hand, has 788.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9684X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9684X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9684X and Ryzen Embedded V3C48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9684X
EPYC 9684X
AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 28 votes

Rate EPYC 9684X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Embedded V3C48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9684X or Ryzen Embedded V3C48, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.