Processor N95 vs EPYC 9654

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
76.66
+2244%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Processor N95 by a whopping 2244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654 and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking51603
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.30no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency19.4219.88
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,805no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654 and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores964 (Quad-Core)
Threads1924
Base clock speed2.4 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm10 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors78,840 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654 and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654 and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9654 and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654 and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654 and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654 and Processor N95.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes1289

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 76.66 3.27
Recency 10 November 2022 3 January 2023
Physical cores 96 4
Threads 192 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 9654 has a 2244.3% higher aggregate performance score, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Processor N95, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 2300% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N95 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N95 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654 and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 992 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 662 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654 or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.