Processor 300T vs EPYC 9654

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654 and Processor 300T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.36no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency19.89no data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,805$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654 and Processor 300T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores962 (Dual-core)
Threads1924
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm10 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2163 mm2
Number of transistors78,840 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654 and Processor 300T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP51700
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654 and Processor 300T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9654 and Processor 300T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654 and Processor 300T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654 and Processor 300T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654 and Processor 300T.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2022 8 January 2024
Physical cores 96 2
Threads 192 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 9654 has 4700% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Processor 300T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 928.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 9654 and Processor 300T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation processor while Processor 300T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654 and Processor 300T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654
Intel Processor 300T
Processor 300T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 995 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Processor 300T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654 or Processor 300T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.