EPYC 9135 vs EPYC 9654

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.70
+107%
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 9135 by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking696
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.3629.26
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency19.9017.30
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Turin (2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,805$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9135 has 2051% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores9616 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads19232
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache6 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache96 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm4 nm
Die size12x 72 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors78,840 million16,630 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9654 75.70
+107%
EPYC 9135 36.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9654 120246
+107%
EPYC 9135 58070

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 75.70 36.56
Recency 10 November 2022 10 October 2024
Physical cores 96 16
Threads 192 32
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 200 Watt

EPYC 9654 has a 107.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9135 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 995 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654 or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.