Xeon w9-3495X vs EPYC 9274F

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9274F
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 320 Watt
46.32
Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
57.83
+24.8%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms EPYC 9274F by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9274F and Xeon w9-3495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4220
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.7018.76
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency13.7015.64
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,060$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3495X has 48% better value for money than EPYC 9274F.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9274F and Xeon w9-3495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads48112
Base clock speed4.05 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.05 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier40.5no data
L1 cache1536 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)105 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size8x 72 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9274F and Xeon w9-3495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9274F and Xeon w9-3495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9274F and Xeon w9-3495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9274F and Xeon w9-3495X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9274F and Xeon w9-3495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9274F and Xeon w9-3495X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9274F 46.32
Xeon w9-3495X 57.83
+24.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9274F 73582
Xeon w9-3495X 91866
+24.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.32 57.83
Recency 10 November 2022 15 February 2023
Physical cores 24 56
Threads 48 112
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 9274F has 9.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3495X, on the other hand, has a 24.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9274F in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9274F and Xeon w9-3495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9274F
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 7 votes

Rate EPYC 9274F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 177 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9274F or Xeon w9-3495X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.