Ryzen 9 5900XT vs EPYC 9274F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9274F
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 320 Watt
46.32
+66%
Ryzen 9 5900XT
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
27.91

EPYC 9274F outperforms Ryzen 9 5900XT by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 5900XT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking42170
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.7070.37
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency13.7025.16
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Vermeer (2020−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)31 July 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,060$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 5900XT has 454% better value for money than EPYC 9274F.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 5900XT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed4.05 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.05 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier40.5no data
L1 cache1536 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm7 nm
Die size8x 72 mm22x 74 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million8,300 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 5900XT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5AM4
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 5900XT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 5900XT are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 5900XT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR4
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 5900XT.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9274F 46.32
+66%
Ryzen 9 5900XT 27.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9274F 73582
+65.9%
Ryzen 9 5900XT 44341

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.32 27.91
Recency 10 November 2022 31 July 2024
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 9274F has a 66% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 9 5900XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 204.8% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9274F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 5900XT in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9274F is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 5900XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9274F and Ryzen 9 5900XT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9274F
AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT
Ryzen 9 5900XT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 7 votes

Rate EPYC 9274F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 62 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9274F or Ryzen 9 5900XT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.