Ultra 9 285 vs EPYC 9274F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9274F and Core Ultra 9 285 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking42not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.70no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency13.70no data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$3,060no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9274F and Core Ultra 9 285 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed4.05 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.05 GHz5.6 GHz
Multiplier40.5no data
L1 cache1536 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm3 nm
Die size8x 72 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million17,800 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9274F and Core Ultra 9 285 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP51851
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9274F and Core Ultra 9 285. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9274F and Core Ultra 9 285 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9274F and Core Ultra 9 285 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9274F and Core Ultra 9 285. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9274F and Core Ultra 9 285.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Pros & cons summary


Threads 48 24
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 125 Watt

EPYC 9274F has 100% more threads.

Ultra 9 285, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 156% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 9274F and Core Ultra 9 285. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9274F is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 285 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9274F and Core Ultra 9 285, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9274F
Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Core Ultra 9 285

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 7 votes

Rate EPYC 9274F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 74 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9274F or Core Ultra 9 285, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.