Ultra 7 265T vs EPYC 9174F

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking106not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.10no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency10.32no data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$3,850no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads3220
Base clock speed4.1 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier41no data
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm3 nm
Die size8x 72 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million17,800 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP51851
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265T.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 16 20
Threads 32 20
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 9174F has 60% more threads.

Ultra 7 265T, on the other hand, has 25% more physical cores, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 814.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9174F is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
Core Ultra 7 265T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9174F or Core Ultra 7 265T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.