EPYC 9354 vs EPYC 9124

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9124
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
28.73
EPYC 9354
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
44.33
+54.3%

EPYC 9354 outperforms EPYC 9124 by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9124 and EPYC 9354 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17053
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.329.97
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency13.1014.44
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,083$3,420

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9124 has 124% better value for money than EPYC 9354.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9124 and EPYC 9354 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed3 GHz3.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.25 GHz
Multiplier3032.5
L1 cache1 MB2 MB
L2 cache16 MB32 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size4x 72 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors26,280 million52,560 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9124 and EPYC 9354 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9124 and EPYC 9354. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9124 and EPYC 9354 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9124 and EPYC 9354. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9124 and EPYC 9354.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9124 28.73
EPYC 9354 44.33
+54.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9124 43963
EPYC 9354 67842
+54.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 9124 1832
+3%
EPYC 9354 1779

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 9124 13428
+4.2%
EPYC 9354 12881

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.73 44.33
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 9124 has 40% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9354, on the other hand, has a 54.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 9354 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9124 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9124 and EPYC 9354, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9124
EPYC 9124
AMD EPYC 9354
EPYC 9354

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9124 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9354 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9124 or EPYC 9354, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.